Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are acquired while patients
are receiving treatment for another condition in a healthcare setting.
The Utah Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) works with
community partners to monitor and prevent these infections because they
are an important threat to patient safety and extremely costly to treat.
Utah Health Code, Title 26, Chapter 6, Section 31 requires the DHHS to
collect data on HAIs from healthcare facilities and report this data to
the public on an annual basis. This report contains the following
data:
The information in this report should be considered an overview of
HAIs in Utah and has several limitations. This report used NHSN data
self-reported by healthcare facilities. Validation of these data by DHHS
is limited. Data does not reflect variabilities of patient acuity
experienced in different facility settings. The COVID-19 pandemic may
have impacted the data collection and HAI rates.
*Ambulatory surgical centers excluded. Data from this setting are not included in NHSN.
Utah Department of Health and Human Services
Healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance program
P.O. Box 142104
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
PH 801-538-6191
• FAX 801-538-9923
Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a major, often
preventable, threat to patient safety. The Utah Department of Health and
Human Services (DHHS) Healthcare-associated Infections and Antimicrobial
Resistance (HAI/AR) program helps Utah patients receive the best and
safest care. Implementation of statewide HAI prevention efforts is an
essential part of a comprehensive patient safety program. Publicly
released HAI data is an important step in transparency creation for
healthcare safety and quality in Utah.
Patients have a right to feel safe and assured that public health is
working to eliminate preventable infections. Thanks to all the
healthcare professionals and facilities in Utah who work tirelessly
toward this goal. Two of the keys to HAI elimination are 1) accurate
collection of data to assess prevention impact, and 2) dissemination of
results to healthcare providers and consumers. Conscientious efforts in
data reporting contribute toward meeting HAI prevention efforts and
control needs.
This 2021 Annual healthcare-associated infections report was
developed in accordance with recommendations established by the Utah
healthcare infection prevention (UHIP) governance committee, a
multi-disciplinary panel of state leaders in patient safety, infectious
diseases, and infection control. It provides an update on previous HAI
reports and details Utah’s progress toward the goal of reduction and,
ultimately, elimination of HAIs.
This report allows Utahns to compare HAIs among 5 healthcare settings (ACHs, CAHs, LTACHs, IRFs, and dialysis facilities) in Utah and the United States. The data in this report are self-reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) by each facility required to report HAIs by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The DHHS analyzes the data using proven statistical methods to provide comparison information.
Clinical Coordinator
HAI/AR Program
Utah Department
of Health and Human Services
Prior reports were reported through 70+ pages of PDF files. This year the report has been updated as a dashboard to ensure easier delivery of data.
We recommend reading through the light green tabs first, which include the executive summary, foreword, and interpreting HAI data. Then, click on the dark purple Utah HAIs tab above to see drop down data pages on each HAI. The last About the data tab goes through the introduction, how Utah HAI data is collected, data quality validation, validation conclusions, references, and acknowledgements.
In the Overview and events tables, column headers may be underlined with light blue. Hover over these to read term definitions.
Thank you!
The SIR is the ratio of the observed number of infections (events) to the number of predicted infections (events) for a specific time period.
National baseline: Aggregated data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) by all facilities during a baseline period is used to “predict” the number of infections expected to occur in a hospital, state, or in the country. In the 2021 National and State Healthcare-Associated Infections Progress Report, the number of predicted infections is an estimate adjusted for each facility through the use of variables known to be significant predictors of HAIs, such as the number of community-onset infections or the number of annual patient days. Incidence was also analyzed for each quarter in 2020 and compared with 2021, with appropriate risk adjustments made for the respective HAI, to assess the impact of COVID-19 on HAIs. Due to the high number of hospitalizations in 2020, the predicted number of infections was significantly higher than previous years for most HAIs.
SIR value | Interpretation |
---|---|
Fewer than 1 | There were fewer infections observed than predicted, based on the national aggregate data. |
Equal to 1 | There were about the same number of infections observed as predicted, based on the national aggregate data. |
More than 1 | There were more infections observed than predicted, based on the national aggregate data. |
Examples: 45 observed cases/30 expected cases:
the SIR is 45/30 = 1.5 Since 1.5 is 50% greater than 1, the SIR
indicated an excess of 50%.
15 observed cases/30 expected cases: the SIR is 15/30 = 0.5 Since 0.5
is 50% less than 1, a SIR = 0.5 would indicate a 50% decrease.
To enforce a minimum precision criterion, SIRs are only calculated when
the number of predicted infections is greater than 1. This rule was
instituted by NHSN to avoid the calculation and interpretation of
statistically imprecise SIRs, which typically have extreme values.
Key:
Statistically FEWER infections than the national
aggregate data
Statistically
MORE infections than the national aggregate data
Predicted to have less than one infection for the year, and had
ZERO infections, as defined by NHSN, in 2021
Predicted to have less than one infection for the year, but had one or
more infections, as defined by NHSN, in 2021
NOT statistically different from the national aggregate data
Significant Utah SIRs compared to national aggregate data:
Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are infections people acquire
while they are receiving treatment for another condition in a healthcare
setting. HAIs can be acquired anywhere healthcare is delivered,
including inpatient acute care hospitals (ACH), outpatient settings
(e.g., ambulatory surgical centers and dialysis facilities), and
long-term care facilities (e.g., nursing homes and rehabilitation
centers). HAIs may be caused by any infectious agent, including
bacteria, fungi, and viruses, as well as other less common pathogens.
HAIs include central-line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs),
catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), surgical site
infections (SSIs), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
(MRSA) bacteremia infections, and Clostridioides
difficile-associated infections (CDIs).
Economic studies estimate HAI treatments cost more than $9 billion a
year when looking from the hospital perspective (Scott et al., 2019).
However, this does not address the societal cost perspective. HAIs can
have devastating emotional, financial, and medical consequences for the
person affected (HHS, 2022). Each day, approximately 1 in 31 U.S.
patients has at least 1 infection associated with their hospital care.
These infections can lead to significant morbidity and mortality, with
tens of thousands of lives lost each year, which underscores the need
for improvements in infection prevention practices in U.S. healthcare
facilities (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ], 2019;
CDC, 2018).
The DHHS HAI/AR program’s mission is to prevent healthcare-associated infections and the spread of antimicrobial-resistant organisms through collaboration with partners; surveillance and response to outbreaks; data analysis; education; and policy change. As one of the activities under this mission, the program produces this annual report to document and analyze HAI trends in Utah healthcare facilities (reporting facilities outlined in executive summary). The NHSN statistics calculator was used to determine statistical significance. This calculator provides a relative ratio of SIRs, a two-tailed p-value, and a 95% confidence interval.
HAIs may be caused by various types of invasive devices, such as a
central line or urinary catheter, used when patients are ill (Marschall
et al., 2014). The longer these devices are in place, the greater the
risk for infection (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [HHS],
2022). In 2021, U.S. acute care facilities observed significant
increases in annual HAI rates for CLABSIs and CAUTIs when compared with
2020. Specifically, acute care facilities reported a 7% increase in
CLABSIs and a 5% increase in CAUTIs (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention [CDC], 2022a). In Utah, there were increases observed for
both CLABSIs and CAUTIs (3% and 7%, respectively); however, the SIRs
were not found to be significantly different when compared with 2020
(p=0.82 and p=0.57, respectively) (CDC NHSN, 2022).
HAIs may also occur as a result of complications following a surgical procedure or when infection control practices, such as hand washing, are not followed (Anderson et al., 2014). While advances have been made in infection control and prevention and antimicrobial prophylaxis, these infections are not uncommon and account for 20% of all HAIs (CDC National Healthcare Safety Network [NHSN], 2023). According to the 2021 National and State Healthcare-Associated Infections Progress Report, there was an 11% increase in abdominal hysterectomy SSIs at the national level. Utah, by comparison, experienced a 45% decrease which was found to be statistically significant when compared with Utah’s 2020 SIR (p= 0.03). The infection rates for colon surgery SSIs had no statistically significant change from 2020 for both Utah and the U.S. (CDC, 2022a).
MRSA is a bacterium resistant to many antibiotics and is common in
healthcare facilities. In the community, most MRSA infections are skin
infections. In medical facilities, MRSA may cause life-threatening
bloodstream (or bacteremia) infections, endocarditis, pneumonia, and
surgical site infections (Calfee et al., 2014). Although significant
progress has been made to reduce MRSA bloodstream infections, MRSA still
poses a formidable clinical threat, with persistently high morbidity and
mortality (Turner et al., 2019). The total number of MRSA bacteremia
cases reported both nationally and in Utah increased from 2020 to 2021.
U.S. acute care facilities experienced a 14% increase between 2020 and
2021 (p= <0.0001) (CDC, 2022a). While Utah experienced more overall
events, there was a 5% decrease when comparing SIRs from 2020 and 2021.
This decrease was not found to be significant (p= 0.83). However, it is
worth noting that 28 acute care facilities in Utah reported 0 cases of
MRSA in 2021 (CDC NHSN, 2022).
Patients who receive medical care and take antibiotics for long
periods of time are more susceptible to HAIs, such as CDIs. Although
antibiotics quickly and effectively eliminate bacterial infections, they
also get rid of the good bacteria that protects the body against harmful
infections. Antibiotic misuse and subsequent antibiotic resistance has
driven the growth of CDIs and the emergence of new strains (Spigaglia,
2016). CDIs are estimated to cause almost half a million infections in
the United States each year, and now rival MRSA as the most common
organism to cause HAIs in the U.S. (CDC 2022b; Dubberke et al., 2014).
Furthermore, one in 11 patients older than age 65 with CDI die within a
month of diagnosis (CDC, 2022b). Fortunately, there was a 3% decrease in
hospital onset CDIs in the U.S. ACHs between 2020 and 2021 (p=
<0.0001) (CDC, 2022a). Utah also experienced a 4% decrease; however,
the difference in SIRs was not found to be statistically significant (p=
0.65) (CDC NHSN, 2022).
Patients who undergo dialysis treatment (a treatment for patients
with inadequate kidney function) also have an increased risk for
acquiring HAIs. They are at high risk because this artificial process to
get rid of waste and fluid in the body requires frequent use of
catheters to access the bloodstream. Dialysis patients may have weakened
immune systems, which also increases their risk for infection (CDC,
2020). The raw number of dialysis event bloodstream infections (BSI) has
continued to decrease each year both nationally and in Utah, with Utah
2021 data showing 8 fewer reported infections. As this downward trend
continues, the predicted number of infections each year has also
decreased, affecting the calculated SIR values. Given this, when
comparing Utah dialysis BSI event SIRs from 2020 to 2021, a 16% increase
was observed. Still, this difference was not found to be statistically
significant (p= 0.48) (CDC NHSN, 2022).
The impacts to HAI incidence were particularly evident during the COVID-19 pandemic. Not only were there challenges in the healthcare response to rising hospitalization rates, there were also documented shortages in healthcare personnel, which led to decreased HAI prevention and surveillance by facilities (Wu et al., 2021). The nation continued to experience unprecedented challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021; however, hospitals resumed mandated reporting of HAIs which resulted in a return to pre-pandemic numbers of facilities reporting into NHSN. CDC analysis reveals that many HAIs continued to increase in U.S. hospitals during 2021, the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Most notably, NHSN data shows a significantly higher incidence in central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia in 2021 compared with 2019 (CDC, 2022a).
These findings stress the importance of action from public health and
healthcare facilities to eliminate infections that commonly threaten
hospital patients, especially during times of emergent crises.
Identification of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) requires an
organized, multi-pronged approach. It is important to determine whether
infections are healthcare-associated or already present upon facility
admission. Due to the concerns about deadly and costly HAIs, state
regulation requires the Utah Department of Health and Human Services
(DHHS) to collect and report data on HAIs.
Since 2008, acute care hospitals with intensive care units have
submitted data directly to the DHHS for the annual HAI report. However,
reporting facilities were not identified by name. In 2011, the Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) required acute healthcare
facilities to report specific HAI data to the National Healthcare Safety
Network (NHSN) for payment reimbursement. In 2012, Utah
Health Code Title 26, Chapter 6, Section 31, Public Reporting of
Healthcare Associated Infections, was passed which requires the DHHS
to: a) access and analyze facility-specific NHSN data required by CMS;
b) publish an annual HAI report for the public in which facilities are
identified by name; and c) conduct validation activities.
Facilities in Utah submit data about specific HAIs to the NHSN, a
secure, online tracking system used by hospitals and other healthcare
facilities. The Utah data are reported to NHSN by each facility that is
required to report HAIs to CMS. More than 17,000 hospitals and other
healthcare facilities nationwide report data to NHSN. This information
is then used to summarize HAI data at the national level and for care
improvement by facilities, states, regions, quality groups, and national
public health agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC).
For an HAI to be publicly reported in Utah under Title 26, Chapter 6, Section 31, an HAI must meet CMS’s specific reporting measures required for reporting to NHSN. The DHHS works with NHSN and other partners to monitor and prevent these infections as they are a significant threat to patient safety.
The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is required under
Utah Title 26-6-31, Public Reporting of Healthcare-Associated Infections
(HAIs), to validate data reported to NHSN. Guidance from the CDC helped
direct the selection of infection types for validation of 2021 NHSN
data. This guidance included the use of results from the targeted
assessment for prevention (TAP) strategy to prioritize activities, an
increased focus on antimicrobial resistance, and a focus on specific
facility types, acute care hospitals (ACH) and dialysis facilities. This
information led DHHS to perform validation of CLABSIs and CAUTI events.
The focus of these validation activities was to determine how NHSN
CLABSI and CAUTI event surveillance definitions were interpreted and
applied to data collection. The validations were performed by the DHHS
HAI/AR program at healthcare facilities throughout the state. Facilities
were chosen based on an NHSN targeted selection process from the NHSN
External Validation Guidance and Toolkit for 2021. The facility
selection process prioritized validation of facilities where HAIs were
most expected. This method compared facilities’ SIR and cumulative
attributable difference (CAD) scores to help identify those facilities
with high risk of HAIs, and also those facilities whose scores showed
they were performing well in their practices to prevent infection.
Validation activities are intended to compare reported information in
NHSN with DHHS audit findings and outcomes to enhance accuracy and
completeness of CLABSI and CAUTI reporting. A standardized validation
method, as guided by NHSN, was chosen to serve as a test of proficiency
in surveillance methods and accuracy in case findings. It should also be
noted that results from these facilities may not be generalized to all
facilities in the state. Also, because the audit sample was targeted and
unweighted, aggregate findings are not necessarily indicative of NHSN
data quality throughout the state.
An on-site medical record audit was conducted at the chosen healthcare facilities (3 ACHs and 6 dialysis facilities). Each visit started with an interview of at least 1 member of the infection prevention staff to learn about surveillance methodology, data collection, and personnel training and education on applications of NHSN criteria. Additionally, CDC’s targeted assessment for prevention (TAP) tools were utilized at each facility to determine current prevention practices and make recommendations based on those responses. In each facility, as many as 20 charts were reviewed, including charts of patients identified by the facility as having a CLABSI event and charts of patients who had a positive blood culture but were not identified as having a CLABSI, to determine if any reportable infections were missed. Additionally, as many as 20 charts of patients who were determined to have a CAUTI in 2021 were reviewed to determine if they correctly met the CAUTI criteria. As many as 20 charts of patients who had a positive urine culture (a urine culture with no more than 2 species of organisms identified, at least 1 of which is a bacterium with >10 ^5 CFU/mL), but were not classified as a CAUTI, were also reviewed to determine if any reportable infections were missed. Results of the validation findings were reviewed with the facility to provide immediate on-site education to improve HAI surveillance and reporting. Facilities were expected to correct data in NHSN based on validation findings.
Validation results indicate the number of CLABSIs and CAUTIs reported
by facilities into NHSN are generally accurate.
Infection preventionists at the validated facilities (ACHs and
dialysis facilities) were able to correctly determine which patients met
the CLABSI definition and apply the definition appropriately. Factors
such as the timeline of central line placement, blood culture results,
symptom history, and the type of organism identified must all be
considered to determine whether CLABSI criteria were met. For complete
CLABSI definitions, refer to the
NHSN LCBI Checklist.
For CAUTIs, all infection preventionists at the validated facilities
(ACHs) were able to correctly determine which patients met the
definition and apply the definition appropriately. When performing CAUTI
validation, the criteria used to meet the definition included: a urine
culture with no more than 2 species of organism identified, at least 1
of which is a bacterium with > 10 (5) CFU/ml; an indwelling urinary
catheter which had been in place for longer than 2 days on the day of
the event; and the indicative signs and symptoms were present at the
appropriate time during the infection window period. If no signs or
symptoms were present but all other criteria were met, then a blood
specimen with at least 1 matching bacterium to the bacterium in the
urine specimen could be used to meet criteria for a CAUTI.
CDC TAP facility assessment tools for CAUTIs in ACHs demonstrated that 100% of all facilities reported leadership who actively promoted CAUTI prevention activities. Furthermore, all facilities reported they provide training to the appropriate healthcare personnel on each of the proper treatment practices addressed in the assessment. However, conducting regular competency assessments for each of these practices highlights an area for improvement. For example, all facilities reported conducting competency assessments on aseptic technique for urinary catheter insertion upon hire; however, only 63% reported assessing this at least annually. Additionally, 75% of facilities reported conducting annual assessments on proper urinary catheter maintenance procedures, and only 38% reported conducting annual assessments on the use of bladder scanners.
Validation results demonstrate that facilities which were validated have a good understanding of reporting criteria and report HAIs accurately into NHSN. However, local surveillance data quality, HAI surveillance data completeness, timeliness, sensitivity, and specificity can always be improved. Additionally, as standardized infection ratios (SIR) remain above the national target outlined in the HHS Action Plan to Prevent Healthcare-associated Infections, there is a continued need for robust validation programs (HHS, 2022). It is important to determine whether infections are healthcare-associated or were already present upon facility admission in order to implement appropriate infection prevention measures. Accurate HAI data supports facilities’ efforts to implement effective infection prevention strategies. The validation site visit provides an opportunity for collaboration and education. The HAI/AR program extends our appreciation to the facilities chosen for a validation visit.
AHRQ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Estimating the additional hospital inpatient cost and mortality associated with selected hospital-Acquired conditions. (2017, November). Retrieved from https://www.ahrq.gov/hai/pfp/haccost2017-results.html
AHRQ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Network. Patient Safety 101. Health Care - Associated Infections. (2019, September 7). Retrieved from https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/health-care-associated-infections
Anderson, D. J., Podgorny, K., Berríos-Torres, S. I., Bratzler, D. W., Dellinger, E. P., Greene, L., Nyquist, A.-C., Saiman, L., Yokoe, D. S., Maragakis, L. L., & Kaye, K. S. (2014). Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 35(6), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1086/676022
Calfee, D. P., Salgado, C. D., Milstone, A. M., Harris, A. D., Kuhar, D. T., Moody, J., Aureden, K., Huang, S. S., Maragakis, L. L., & Yokoe, D. S. (2014). Strategies to prevent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission and infection in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 35(7), 772–796. https://doi.org/10.1086/676534
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012, March 6). Making health care safer - Stopping C. difficile infections. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/hai/stoppingcdifficile/index.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015, October 16). Catheter-Associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/hai/ca_uti/uti.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018, October 5). Healthcare associated infections (HAIs): HAI data. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/index.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019, December). Antibiotic resistance threats 2019. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/threats-report/2019-ar-threats-report-508.pdf
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020, January 7). Dialysis safety. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/dialysis/
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022a, November 4). 2021 National and state healthcare-Associated infections progress report. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/portal/progress-report.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022b, September 7). C. diff (Clostridioides difficile). Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/cdiff/index.html
CDC National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). (2022). Patient safety component. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/
CDC National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). (2023). Surgical site infection event (SSI). Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf
Dubberke, E. R., Carling, P., Carrico, R., Donskey, C. J., Loo, V. G., McDonald, L. C., Maragakis, L. L., Sandora, T. J., Weber, D. J., Yokoe, D. S., & Gerding, D. N. (2014). Strategies to prevent Clostridium difficile infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 35(6), 628–645. https://doi.org/10.1086/676023
Marschall, J., Mermel, L. A., Fakih, M., Hadaway, L., Kallen, A., O’Grady, N. P., Pettis, A. M., Rupp, M. E., Sandora, T., Maragakis, L. L., & Yokoe, D. S. (2014). Strategies to prevent central line–Associated bloodstream infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 35(7), 753–771. https://doi.org/10.1086/676533
Moriyama, K., Ando, T., Kotani, M., Tokumine, J., Nakazawa, H., Motoyasu, A., Yorozu, T., (2022). Risk factors associated with increased incidences of catheter-Related bloodstream infection. Medicine 101(42):p e31160, October 21, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031160
Scott, R. D., Culler, S. D., Rask, K. J., (2019). Understanding the economic impact of health care-Associated infections: A cost perspective analysis. The Art and Science of Infusion Nursing, 42(2), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000313
Spigaglia P. (2016). Recent advances in the understanding of antibiotic resistance in Clostridium difficile infection. Therapeutic advances in infectious disease, 3(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2049936115622891
Turner, N.A., Sharma-Kuinkel, B. K., Maskarinec, S. A., Eichenberger, E. M., Shah, P. P., Carugati, M., Holland, T. L., Fowler, V. G. (2019). Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview of basic and clinical research. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 17, 203–218 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0147-4
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2022, December 7). National action plan to prevent health care associated infections: Road map to elimination. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/oidp/topics/health-care-associated-infections/hai-action-plan/index.html
Wu, H., Soe, M. M., Konnor, R., Dantes, R., Haass, K., Dudeck, M. A., Gross, C., Leaptrot, D., Sapiano, M. R. P., Allen-Bridson, K., Wattenmaker, L., Peterson, K., Lemoine, K., Chernetsky Tejedor, S., Edwards, J. R., Pollock, D., Benin, A. L., & National Healthcare Safety Network (2022). Hospital capacities and shortages of healthcare resources among US hospitals during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), March 27-July 14, 2020. Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 43(10), 1473–1476. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2021.280
Prepared by:
Carolynn McCartney, Ashley Young,
Devin Beard, April Clements
Division of Population
Health
Healthcare-associated infections and
antimicrobial resistance program
Utah Department of Health and Human
Services
Special thanks to the following individuals for their subject matter
expertise, data resources, editing, and consultations:
Angela Weil, APRN | Devin Beard, MPH |
April Clements, RN, BSN, CIC | Janelle Kammerman, BS |
Ashley Young, MAS, CHES | Jeffery Rogers, MPH |
Carolynn McCartney, MPH | Joshua Mongillo, MPH |
Charisse Schenk, MPH, CPH, CHES | Linda Rider, RN, BSN, CIC |
Chrissy Radloff, RN, MSN | Rebekah Ess, MSPH |
Danene Price, RN, BSN | Tariq Mosleh, Pharm D, PhD |
Chief executive officers
Infection preventionists
Chief medical officers
Chief nursing officers
Quality improvement directors